Pat ..... dude!

Welcome PatRiot ... welcome brother.

imaginethat wrote:Welcome PatRiot ... welcome brother.

Mega ditto's!

I second that.

Obviously, Swifty got my PM, then.


Welcome, Pat Riot! ABout damned time you got here!

Wassup fellow rebels!

I didn't know if I'd ever get in, but I finally gave in and swore my soul over to Ron Paul . . . and, WHAM, I'm in like a creme-filled bismark.

And really, it wasn't all that painful, was it?

I felt like that guy in Raiders of the Lost Ark looking into the ark . . . and my face melting off.

Pat Riot'76 wrote:I felt like that guy in Raiders of the Lost Ark looking into the ark . . . and my face melting off.

Why is that? Are you refering to this Iowa heat?


Oh, another thing...did ya happen to see Tak on your way in here? I sent him an invite too!

No. Swearing my soul to Ron Paul.

Well that and I had some cancer cut out of my face. Got a nice 4.3 cm cut on my right cheek. I suppose if a guy can't look pretty, might as well look tough.

* * * * *

Man! Craig1974 reads like he is possessed by SND with the "necessity of political compromise" elephant crap over at ConCon. It doesn't even sound like him anymore.

Pat Riot'76 wrote:No. Swearing my soul to Ron Paul.

Well that and I had some cancer cut out of my face. Got a nice 4.3 cm cut on my right cheek. I suppose if a guy can't look pretty, might as well look tough.

* * * * *

Man! Craig1974 reads like he is possessed by SND with the "necessity of political compromise" elephant crap over at ConCon. It doesn't even sound like him anymore.

Fear will do that to ya.....
Many folks are afraid of what may happen and so they "compromise" in order to delay/soften what they're afraid of, namely Obama and his agenda. However, at this point, I don't think it matters anymore who wins....we've gone past the PONR.

Interesting times are here, and they're gonna get more interesting in the ensuing months!

In a way, it's too bad I cannot watch it, but the ... heck, what should they be called? Neocons? Statists? CC Republicans? Imaginary Tea Party members? The Romans 13 advocates? What?? .... well, anyway, "them," they are going to be interesting to watch from now till November.

CC perfectly displays all the reasons why the GOP only looks better when the other side looks worse.

imaginethat wrote:In a way, it's too bad I cannot watch it, but the ... heck, what should they be called? Neocons? Statists? CC Republicans? Imaginary Tea Party members? The Romans 13 advocates? What?? .... well, anyway, "them," they are going to be interesting to watch from now till November.

CC perfectly displays all the reasons why the GOP only looks better when the other side looks worse.

I could be wrong.....but I don't think republicans are going to gain as much as they say they are this time......

Doc Trock wrote:

imaginethat wrote:In a way, it's too bad I cannot watch it, but the ... heck, what should they be called? Neocons? Statists? CC Republicans? Imaginary Tea Party members? The Romans 13 advocates? What?? .... well, anyway, "them," they are going to be interesting to watch from now till November.

CC perfectly displays all the reasons why the GOP only looks better when the other side looks worse.

I could be wrong.....but I don't think republicans are going to gain as much as they say they are this time......

Well, pop over to Outcast Conservatives, the First Amendment section, and see how some neocons ain't lettin' go. And it's these jackasses who think they are "appreciably" different from liberal jackasses.

imaginethat wrote:In a way, it's too bad I cannot watch it, but the ... heck, what should they be called? Neocons? Statists? CC Republicans? Imaginary Tea Party members? The Romans 13 advocates? What?? .... well, anyway, "them," they are going to be interesting to watch from now till November.

CC perfectly displays all the reasons why the GOP only looks better when the other side looks worse.

Maybe I listen to Alex Jones too much, but...


After I watch "Endgame" (What I'm watching as we speak) and "The Obama Deception" (Both of which were taken down by YouTube over this last weekend, and restored there by Alex Jones himself, BTW), I've really began to wonder if Coverts isn't somehow funded or controlled by some elite group like the Masons or the Rothchilds. We know that Streetsoldier is a mason, and look how Chary and Tats circle the wagons every time one of us try to demonstrate the one sidedness of the forum. They are lock step with each other over there.

Notice the ONE TIME that I say anything about the Rothchild/Bilderbergers/NWO, etc. on a thread (I forget which one) where WE "Paulians" were winning on two-three months ago, and all Chary had to reply with was a "Shakehead" emoticon, and a few days later, the thread was mysteriously locked.

Or would the Bilderbergers even bother with small potatoes like that forum? Maybe I'm just thinking way too much. I dunno...I'm just jabbering here.

And Paul...don't feel bad that you can't post there any more...BH Mason has pretty much become the new mouthpiece over on Main...pretty much reversing everything that you and Doc had to say...And Pat Riot is correct about what he's observed about some once solid Ron Paulian voices over there...pretty much has sold Ron Paul down the river. I'm not sure where they are at anymore. I think that they have given up the fight.

I wouldn't be surprised if SND opens up a new moderator position for BH in a few months. Anybody want to take a betting pool on that?

We need to invite a few more over here, so we can re-train them and get them de-programed!

I don't know about that, but I know for a fact the parties both pay people to go to websites and quash dissension. It wouldn't surprise me at all if they made sites like CC just to try and keep people from going off the reservation.

Tin-foiler.


Nah, I think you're spot on.

There's a republican site for iowa politics. Conservatives, constitutionalists, and Christians that go on there and talk principles rather than party are attacked mercilessly by GOPbots (just as much vitriol as on Dem sites & the Dems on the site say repeatedly that if the GOP goes conservative then it is the end of the GOP . . . hmmmm) -- rumors are some of them are on the payrolls of "moderate" Republican party leaders and financiers.

Spill the beans, fellow Iowan...what site is that???

Vander Platts was ravaged before the primary and then ridiculed for not supporting the establishment-favorite Branstad immediately.

http://theiowarepublican.com/home/

the publisher seems to be fair with conservatives, he claims to be one (of course -- don't all Republicans), but the despisement by GOPbots is no different than experiences at other conservative sites w/GOPbots at the helm.

I'm sure Tats subscribes to this tripe!